Points to Ponder:
Are there ethical risks related to self-directed learning?
Ruminations:
At risk of sounding terribly negative, this week I chose to reflect on the
responsibility of adult educators who assume goals for self-directed learning.
Merriam, et al (2007) list three goals of self-directed learning
for adult educators.
1. To enhance the ability of adult learners to be self-directed in
their learning.
2. To foster transformational learning
3. To promote emancipatory
learning and social action.
As an educator, I think my goal is to
foster self-directed learning as an ability to learn independently in order to
fulfill one’s needs as well as desires.
I don’t think it is my place to determine what a learner’s direction
should be. Furthermore, I think one must
consider that to have a preconceived goal of another person runs a risk of
exerting power especially if there is perceived authority. In other words, if I am teaching a basic
technology class, I should not turn that learning activity into a push for
social action unless the class is so motivated.
Through this process, it seems I lean towards goal one, understanding
that as an educator I have the potential to influence adult learners in various
directions through their efforts of self-directed learning. If a determined goal is necessary, I think it
should be broad and vague enough to allow the educator and the learner to
determine their own goal.
I would think an educator must be
concerned with their power of influence.
With the best intentions to lead a learner, an educator may impose their
own views of success or “right” direction.
I
have spent hours today researching ethics and self-directed learning. All I seem to find refers to the unethical
practice of allowing the student to be completely self taught as opposed to
assisting in the process of learning (Brockett and Hiemstra, 1991). I
can see where that may be a concern.
Fisher (1995) speaks to this concern describing a scenario where a
charismatic, articulate person could essentially act in the educator role even
if he or she was not a content expert.
The students would have a feeling of satisfaction, however; they risk
have true knowledge of content. I also
see potential for an educator to encourage a learning process that is more
“efficient” instead of allowing the student to decide direction. Considering the lack of research in ethical
considerations of self-directed learning, I think there is a need for more
study. Is self-directed teaching a
philosophy? There are several learning
models designed for self-directed learning.
Should an educator be professionally trained in the techniques?
Brokett, R. and Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-Direction in Adult Learning: Perspectives on Theory, Research, and Practice. Chapter 11: Ethical Dilemmas in Self-Direction. Retrieved from http://www-distance.syr.edu/sdlindex.html on October 28, 2012.
Fisher,
T.D. (1995). Self-Directedness in Adult
Vocational Education Students: Its Role in Learning and Implications For
Instruction. Journal for Vocational and
Technical Education. Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JVTE/v12n1/fisher.html
on October 28, 2012.
Merriam, S.B., Caffarella, R.M., Baumgartner, L.M. (2007). Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide, (3rd ed). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass